# Source-fragment review → script v3

Thirteen separate multimodal reviews received the **actual corresponding original
picture and sound** plus the complete localized scene. Raw inputs, responses and
receipts: `analysis/evidence/replica-scene-review-S01-v2` through `S13-v2`.
These are model observations and editorial suggestions, not measured audience results.

| Scene | Accepted revision / decision | Reason and limit |
|---|---|---|
| S01 | Clarified scarf joke; simplified clinician's sentence. | Cosmetic disappointment cannot carry a life-threatening diagnosis. Deliberate lower stakes, supported through the daughter's interpretation and later repair. No source medical claims transferred. |
| S02 | “І фотографуватися не залишилася.” Kept affected mother passenger, supporting father driving. | Reviewer mistook intentional role adaptation for continuity error. Preserve affected-passenger / worried-driver geography. Source rear-seat girl becomes a safely seated ten-year-old. |
| S03 | “Пані Лариса якраз поруч живе.” Ukrainian actual search inserts required. | Specific remembered lead motivates leaving. No invented “secret” claim. |
| S04 | Kept male host opens / female guide welcomes and explains. | Source frame at66s shows both neighbors. Host/guide genders are adapted; no need to preserve every speaker gender. Same-evening parent call is a declared departure with less disappearance suspense. |
| S05 | Kept child questions, mug/blanket, explanation then cupboard action. | Raw reviewer passed this source-function mapping. Spoken lines still need actual performance review. |
| S06 | “Завтра зайду й сама їй усе розповім. Разом розберемося.” | Warmer adult responsibility. Hydration claim need not be repeated in every scene merely because it appears in the ledger. |
| S07 | Kept dusk departure, pajamas under coat, immediate parent notification and evening reunion. | Explicit local timeline differs from overnight source; parent urgency must fit a short search. Do not add police or car arrival merely to imitate source danger. |
| S08 | Changed “оливний” to “оливковий”; retained return-terms instruction. | Fresh seller page actually contains return terms. No exact efficacy metric or chemical transformation transplanted. Ingredient explanation remains less extraordinary than source; this is a substantive adaptation cost. |
| S09 | Kept trial decision and separate spouse doubt. | Raw reviewer passed. This is retained source development, not instant shared belief. |
| S10 | Replaced ambiguous “суха текстура” with “сухі складочки на шиї”. | Patch/neck action distinction and same-light observation are explicit. Do not add eight weeks solely because original uses it; local seller says3–4weeks. This is a fictional cosmetic illustration, not observed efficacy. |
| S11 | “Частіше гуляє”; specified mother squeezes **Serhii's** hand while looking at Sofia. | Repairs ambiguous hand ownership and preserves the partner callback. Clinician asks about routine, with no jar, brand recommendation or amazement. |
| S12 | Retained credit-to-seeker and explicit repair of child's earlier question. | Model passed. Final expression/lips and response hold remain unmade. |
| S13 | Retained family life and local ordering mechanism. | Model passed. Exact jar and seller interface remain required visual evidence. |

V2 is retained; v3 has555 approximate whitespace-separated words,13 source-linked
scenes and56 spoken turns. These are inventory counts, **not duration targets**.
The callable passes source order/coverage, state prerequisites and question accounting.
Editorial status: writing ready for pronunciation and production preparation;
actual Ukrainian delivery, emotional comprehensiveness of the full film and footage
are unvalidated. No generated voice or finished film exists for this story yet.